GTN
Member
a week after moving into a 1973 year built house in Costa Mesa California, a leak was noted in the wall. A couple days goes by before Home warranty program sent local plumber out and he looked at the wet wall for a couple seconds and walked out saying we need asbestos testing first before he could even punch a hole in the drywall to check the pipe. He said EVERY house older than 1989 needs this first. (Would take a few days). He didn’t do anything and him and home warranty program are trying to get paid. I feel scammed because if that was policy/law, why did they not reveal that requirement when the visit was scheduled. A couple hours later I get a very pushy stranger guy call and offer to estimate water damage costs. Of course no testing or abatement of asbestos would be covered by warranty program.
We called other plumbers who denied this was a law. Does anyone out there know if it is a law? All I can find talking to people I know in the industry and reading online literature is if there needs to be demo over 100 square feet or so then that may be needed. Mine was a small residential leak. I offered to open the wall myself but he refused. It turned out to be a pinhole in the copper and another plumber fixed it as soon as he came out, no questions asked.
I’m fighting the charge. If anyone can help please let me know
We called other plumbers who denied this was a law. Does anyone out there know if it is a law? All I can find talking to people I know in the industry and reading online literature is if there needs to be demo over 100 square feet or so then that may be needed. Mine was a small residential leak. I offered to open the wall myself but he refused. It turned out to be a pinhole in the copper and another plumber fixed it as soon as he came out, no questions asked.
I’m fighting the charge. If anyone can help please let me know