bawldiggle
Active Member
I am re-plumbing our 70 year old house with new copper pipe and fittings.
Some of the final connections are failing/leaking and in some instances are not even structurally sound.
When I melt/pull the joins apart the failed joins are black on the pipe, not a sign of any solder.
I am using (water soluble) flux for lead less-solder and using lead-less solder (roll of coreless lead-less solder)
- using abrasive plumbers tape on outside of pipe and fittings brush prep in copper fittings.
- liberal use of flux in fittings and and on pipe -- before assembling ready to solder.
- using MAP Gas which I know is extremely hot and potentially overkill to melt solder.
- because of access problems I cannot get the heat behind the fittings, only from one side because of close proximity to bearers, joists and flooring.
- and I simply cannot move quick enough to new positions to try and spread more heat. Overhead soldering is not easy and potentially a risk for personal burns (none so far)
I wonder if my problem might be too much heat in a short time with MAP gas on high or not enough solder available on top of the fitting when soldering over head
- I cannot see the top of overhead fittings so I am never sure if the solder-wire is on the edge of the capillary gap or not
- (I could do with a third arm at times, but alas I only have two hands )
- even soldering both ends of a copper fitting is a challenge because of cramped work space
- I guess my question is would I be better of with a stick of solder rather than the thinner rolled solder.
- I bend a hook in the end of the rolled lead-less solder to start the solder flow on top of the fitting/joint -- and heat the fitting to apply the solder.
- I take the heat off the join while applying the solder
- most of the joins by previous plumbers are covered in solder, not as neat as my joins, but frankly I don't care what the joins look like ... as long as they don't leak and are structurally sound
Lead-less solder and flux are all new
- (my leaded solder flux is about 12 years old - the greasy type of flux for lead soft solder)
There are 3 joints in very awkward locations that are giving me grief.
- in frustration I used 2 straight push-on (for copper) connectors
- push-ons are 10 times the cost of soldered copper fittings.
- the third fitting is presently isolated (the push-on caps for copper do have their use)
She-who-must-be-obeyed is getting impatient for her refurbished laundry
- the upgrade revealed a lot of water supply problems ... I assume by qualified plumbers.
I would be very grateful for any help -- thank you
The underfloor crawl space is about 16inches (40cms) so access is a challenge.
I am a human ferret -- luckily only very slight build.
When I started getting too many joint failures and soaked to the skin I changed my process to assembling manifolds in my workshop then making final connections under the floor. (Thankfully it is mid summer here)I am a human ferret -- luckily only very slight build.
Some of the final connections are failing/leaking and in some instances are not even structurally sound.
When I melt/pull the joins apart the failed joins are black on the pipe, not a sign of any solder.
I am using (water soluble) flux for lead less-solder and using lead-less solder (roll of coreless lead-less solder)
- using abrasive plumbers tape on outside of pipe and fittings brush prep in copper fittings.
- liberal use of flux in fittings and and on pipe -- before assembling ready to solder.
- using MAP Gas which I know is extremely hot and potentially overkill to melt solder.
- because of access problems I cannot get the heat behind the fittings, only from one side because of close proximity to bearers, joists and flooring.
- and I simply cannot move quick enough to new positions to try and spread more heat. Overhead soldering is not easy and potentially a risk for personal burns (none so far)
This is my first experience with lead-less solder.
I have plumbed out several houses before (using sticks of lead solder) but never tight access
This current project has me baffled -- and overhead soldering is not easy.
Here in OZ lead solder is still the national accepted standard.
Q1: Is leaded solder easier to apply and more predictable than lead-less solder. ?I have plumbed out several houses before (using sticks of lead solder) but never tight access
This current project has me baffled -- and overhead soldering is not easy.
Here in OZ lead solder is still the national accepted standard.
I wonder if my problem might be too much heat in a short time with MAP gas on high or not enough solder available on top of the fitting when soldering over head
- I cannot see the top of overhead fittings so I am never sure if the solder-wire is on the edge of the capillary gap or not
- (I could do with a third arm at times, but alas I only have two hands )
- even soldering both ends of a copper fitting is a challenge because of cramped work space
- I guess my question is would I be better of with a stick of solder rather than the thinner rolled solder.
- I bend a hook in the end of the rolled lead-less solder to start the solder flow on top of the fitting/joint -- and heat the fitting to apply the solder.
- I take the heat off the join while applying the solder
- most of the joins by previous plumbers are covered in solder, not as neat as my joins, but frankly I don't care what the joins look like ... as long as they don't leak and are structurally sound
Lead-less solder and flux are all new
- (my leaded solder flux is about 12 years old - the greasy type of flux for lead soft solder)
There are 3 joints in very awkward locations that are giving me grief.
- in frustration I used 2 straight push-on (for copper) connectors
- push-ons are 10 times the cost of soldered copper fittings.
- the third fitting is presently isolated (the push-on caps for copper do have their use)
She-who-must-be-obeyed is getting impatient for her refurbished laundry
- the upgrade revealed a lot of water supply problems ... I assume by qualified plumbers.
I would be very grateful for any help -- thank you
Last edited: